A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand Essay Writer

This phrase, “United we stand, divided we fall” is commonly used at different places to emphasize as to how important it is to stay united. The importance of team work has been stressed upon here. “United we stand, divided we fall” is a phrase used to inspire unity and team work. As per this phrase if members of a group work on their own to serve their own individual interests rather than working as a team then they are likely to be doomed and defeated. Here are some ‘United we stand, divided we fall essays’ of varying lengths to help you with the topic in the exam, classroom, etc. You can choose any essay on United we stand, divided we fall according to your need:

Essay on United We Stand Divided We Fall

United We Stand Divided We Fall Essay – 1 (200 words)

“United we stand, divided we fall” means that it is wise to stick together and work in collaboration with others instead of working against each other. Working as a team is a sure shot way to success.

Origin of the Phrase – United We Stand, Divided We Fall

The phrase was coined during the ancient era by the Greek storyteller Aesop. It had a direct mention in his fable “The Four Oxen and the Lion” and indirect one in “The Bundle of Sticks”.

The New Testament also includes a similar phrase that reads, “And if a house be divided against itself that house cannot stand”. Other phrases from the New Testament read, “And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand” and “But he, knowing their thoughts, said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and a house divided against a house falleth”.

Conclusion

The statement is used commonly to emphasize the importance of working in coordination with each other. It is indeed true that a single person cannot accomplish a difficult task or may take a lot of time and energy to do it however if the same task is handled collectively by more men it can easily be accomplished.


United We Stand Divided We Fall Essay – 2 (300 words)

The phrase coined by the ancient Greek storyteller Aesop states the importance of working together as a team. “United we stand, divided we fall” implies that if we work on something as a team and live in harmony with each other we shall succeed in life and if we go against each other and try to work on a task alone we are likely to fail at it.

Explanation by Example

“United we stand, divided we fall”, the phrase is used commonly at several places. However, it has best been explained through the story of a farmer and his sons. The sons could not break a bundle of sticks when they were asked to do it individually however when they were asked to perform the same task jointly they could do it easily. This clearly explains that when people come together they can perform even a difficult task with ease.

Use of the Phrase at Different Places

  • In the U.S. history, the phrase was first used by John Dickinson in his pre-Revolutionary War song, “The Liberty Song”. It was published in the Boston Gazette in July 1768.
  • In December, 1792, the first Kentucky General Assembly adopted the official seal of Commonwealth with the state motto, “United We Stand, Divided We Fall”.
  • Since 1942, the phrase has become the official non-Latin state motto of Kentucky.
  • The phrase is written around the center circle on the Missouri flag.
  • It became popular in India during its struggle for freedom from the British rule. It was used to inspire people to come together and fight for independence.
  • Ulster loyalists have also used this phrase. It is seen in some loyalist Northern Irish murals.
  • The phrase, “United we stand, divided we fall” has also been used in several songs by different artists.

Conclusion

It is rightly said that, “United we stand, divided we fall”. In life, we come across several situations at home, in school, office and other places wherein this phrase holds true. We must thus work and live in harmony with others.

United we Stand Divided we Fall Essay – 3 (500 Words)

Introduction

‘United we stand divided we fall’ is the famous proverb that almost everyone knows. It means that people who are united are the happy people and can achieve any goal in life; but if we keep on fighting and stay away from each other, we fail. Unity holds great significance in every phase of our lives, be it personal or professional. In sports, at office, in family; everywhere happiness and success are the result of unity.

Meaning

Unity means union or togetherness. Strength is basically the direct result of Unity. A group of people which stays united always achieves more success than a single person. That’s why groups are created in almost every field such as office, military forces, sports, etc. In our personal lives too, we live together in the family which give us strength and power to bear our sufferings and celebrate our happiness. At office, teams are formed to achieve any desired result. Likewise in sports and military, groups are created and strategies are made to achieve something.

Significance

In olden days, man lived alone. He travelled and hunted all by himself which sometimes gave opportunities to fierce animal attack and kill him. Then he realized that if he joined hands with other hunters, he would be able to face several common dangers and challenges. This is how, villages got formed which later got developed into the towns, cities and the countries. Unity is required everywhere, as it strengthens the will and power to transform an unacceptable system. Even in music concerts or dance troupe, etc if the group is united; they perform in harmony and synchronisation but the moment each individual starts showing their individual talent, the outcome can be chaotic and disastrous. Unity teaches us to be disciplined; it makes us polite and considerate and the lesson to live together in harmony and peace.  Unity gives us the confidence and power to demand things and achieve result. Even in factories, etc. labourers work in group and form union, if they are undermined or suppressed by the owners. People who work alone can be defeated easily and they little or no confidence to fight for their rights but if they work in groups, they can achieve wonders.

The greatest example is the freedom of our nation; the great Mahatma Gandhi united all the citizens of India belonging to different caste and creed and started the non-violence movement. The world knows, it was all due to his will and the unity of the great freedom fighters and the citizens which ultimately helped in winning the Independence of India.

Conclusion

Unity is the greatest quality of mankind. No single person can achieve, what is to be achieved by a group of people. The real strength lies in being united. A country is strong whose citizens are united; a family is strong whose members stay together. There are several examples which prove that united we stand, divided we fall. Thus unity is important in each and every sphere of our lives.

United we Stand Divided we Fall Essay – 4 (600 Words)

Introduction

United we stand and divided we fall is a famous proverb which signifies that if we are united and stay together, then no one can defeat us. But if we constantly fight and have conflicts or misunderstandings, we may attract outsiders to take advantage of ourselves which may ultimately result into our failure. The proverb clearly indicates that unity is the source of strength and people who are united have the capability to tackle any kind of situation as they share each others’ burden and hardships.

Meaning

Unity means staying together. Unity has an important significance in each and every aspect of people’s lives. In the sports ground, be it cricket, football, baseball, basket ball or any kind of sport, a united team and an appropriate strategy results into the success of the team; but if there is a conflict or unhealthy competition amongst the team members or there is unnecessary misunderstandings amongst them, they may invite the opponents to take advantage of their shortcomings and win the game. Likewise, if the members of a family stay together and support each other in every phase of life, no outsider can harm the family.

Famous Story

There is a famous story which is the base of the proverb ‘united we stand, divided we fall’. There was an old man who lived in a village with his three sons. The sons always fought with each other and would not pay any heed to their father. The man fell sick and assumed that he would die soon; he was very worried about the fact that once he dies, people would take advantage of his sons’ altercations. He called all his sons and asked them to break a bundle of stick, one by one. None of them could do it. He then untied the bundle and gave each stick to each one of them asking to break, which they could very conveniently accomplish. He then told his sons that they should stay like the bundle of the stick so that no one can break them; but if they keep on fighting and separated, they will be broken by the outsiders easily.

Importance

Unity is important in every phase of our lives. An individual can certainly survive alone, but for being happy and celebrating happiness or to bear the sufferings of life, one needs a companion and a family. Likewise, even a corporate cannot be successful, if it doesn’t have the team working with unity to achieve the common goal of the company. A nation also becomes economically strong if the countrymen support the government.

Conclusion

No matter, how successful we become, we will always need people who can stand by us and support us. The proverb ‘United we stand, divided we fall’ will continue to teach lesson to people for years to come. Unity is the pillar of success and it also makes people considerate and understanding. It’s very easy to fight and stay apart from each other, but unity always has an upper hand over everything else.

"House divided" redirects here. For the episode of the TV series House, see House Divided.

The House Divided Speech was an address given by Abraham Lincoln, later President of the United States, on June 16, 1858 at what was then the Illinois State Capitol in Springfield, after he had accepted the Illinois Republican Party's nomination as that state's US senator. The speech became the launching point for his unsuccessful campaign for the seat, held by Stephen A. Douglas; the campaign would climax with the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858.

Lincoln's remarks in Springfield created an image of the danger of slavery-based disunion, and it rallied Republicans across the North. Along with the Gettysburg Address and his second inaugural address, the speech became one of the best-known speeches of his career.

The best-known passage of the speech is this:[1]

A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become lawful in all the States, old as well as new — North as well as South.

Lincoln's goals were to differentiate himself from Douglas the tiger - the incumbent - and to voice a prophecy publicly. Douglas had long advocated popular sovereignty under which the settlers in each new territory would decide their own status as a slave or free state; he had repeatedly asserted that the proper application of popular sovereignty would continue slavery-induced conflict and would allow northern and southern states to resume their peaceful coexistence. Lincoln, however, responded that the Dred Scott decision had closed the door on Douglas's preferred option, leaving the Union with only two remaining outcomes: the country would inevitably become either all slave or all free. Now that the North and the South had come to hold distinct opinions in the question of slavery, and now the issue had come to permeate every other political question, the Union would soon no longer be able to function.

Quotes[edit]

  • "A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved—I do expect the house to fall—but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery, will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the states, old as well as newNorth as well as South. Have we no tendency to the latter condition? Let any one who doubts, carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination— piece of machinery so to speak—compounded of the Nebraska doctrine, and the Dred Scott decision.
  • The Kansas-Nebraska Act opened all the national territory to slavery [...]. This [...] had been provided for [...] in the notable argument of "squatter sovereignty," otherwise called "sacred right of self government," which latter phrase, though expressive of the only rightful basis of any government, was so perverted in this attempted use of it as to amount to just this: That if any one man, choose to enslave another, no third man shall be allowed to object.
  • While the Nebraska Bill was passing through Congress, a law case, involving the question of a negro's freedom … was passing through the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri; and both Nebraska Bill and lawsuit were brought to a decision in the same month of May, 1854. The Negro's name was "Dred Scott" [...].
  • [The points decided by the "Dred Scott" decision include] that whether the holding a negro in actual slavery in a free state, makes him free, as against the holder, the United States courts will not decide, but will leave to be decided by the courts of any slave state the negro may be forced into by the master. This point is made, not to be pressed immediately [...] [that] the logical conclusion that what Dred Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free state Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with any other one, or one thousand slaves, in Illinois, or in any other free state.
  • While the opinion of [...] Chief Justice Taney, in the Dred Scott case [...] expressly declare[s] that the Constitution of the United States neither permits congress nor a territorial legislature to exclude slavery from any United States territory, [...] [Taney] omit[s] to declare whether or not the same constitution permits a state, or the people of a state, to exclude it. Possibly, this was a mere omission; but who can be quite sure [...].
  • The nearest approach to the point of declaring the power of a state over slavery, is made by Judge Nelson. He approaches it more than once, using the precise idea, and almost the language too, of the Nebraska Act. On one occasion his exact language is, "except in cases where the power is restrained by the Constitution of the United States, the law of the State is supreme over the subject of slavery within its jurisdiction." In what cases the power of the states is so restrained by the U.S. Constitution, is left an open question, precisely as the same question, as to the restraint on the power of the territories was left open in the Nebraska Act. Put that and that together, and we have another nice little niche, which we may, ere long, see filled with another Supreme Court decision, declaring that the Constitution of the United States does not permit a state to exclude slavery from its limits. And this may especially be expected if the doctrine of "care not whether slavery be voted down or voted up" shall gain upon the public mind sufficiently to give promise that such a decision can be maintained when made.
  • Such a decision is all that slavery now lacks of being alike lawful in all the States. Welcome, or unwelcome, such decision is probably coming, and will soon be upon us, unless the power of the present political dynasty shall be met and overthrown. We shall lie down pleasantly dreaming that the people of Missouri are on the verge of making their State free, and we shall awake to the reality instead that the Supreme Court has made Illinois a slave

Origins of "House Divided"[edit]

In the Gospel of Mark 3:25, Jesus states, "And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand." That is in response to the scribes' claim that "by the prince of the devils casteth he out devils."[2]

Also, in the Gospel of Matthew 12:25, KJV:

25 And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto him, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:

Saint Augustine, in his Confessions (Book 8, Chapter 8) describes his conversion experience as being "a house divided against itself."

Thomas Hobbes, in his 1651 Leviathan (Chapter 18), states that "a kingdom divided in itself cannot stand."

In Thomas Paine's 1776 Common Sense, he describes the composition of monarchy "hath all the distinctions of a house divided against itself...."

During the War of 1812 a line appeared in a letter from Abigail Adams to Mercy Otis Warren: "... A house divided upon itself - and upon that foundation do our enemies build their hopes of subduing us."[3]

The "house divided" phrase had been used by Lincoln himself in another context in 1843.[4]

Famously, eight years before Lincoln's speech, during the Senate debate on the Compromise of 1850, Sam Houston had proclaimed: "A nation divided against itself cannot stand."

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^Foner, Eric (2010). The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery. pp. 99–100. ISBN 978-0-393-06618-0. 
  2. ^"Mark 3:25". Bible Gateway. 
  3. ^David Kennedy, Lizabeth Cohen, Thomas Bailey: The American Pageant: Volume I: To 1877, p. 253.
  4. ^Address to the people of Illinois, in Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, I, p. 315

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

  • Works related to A house divided at Wikisource
  • Link to "House Divided" speech in Lincoln's Collected Works, held by the Univ. of Michigan.[1]

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *